The preferences and perspectives of nephrologists on patients' access to kidney transplantation: a systematic review

Transplantation. 2014 Oct 15;98(7):682-91. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000336.

Abstract

We aimed to describe nephrologists' attitudes to patients' access to kidney transplantation. Studies that assessed nephrologists' perspectives toward patient referral, screening, and eligibility for kidney transplantation were synthesized. Twenty-four studies (n≥4695) were included. Patients with comorbidities, were nonadherent, of older age, ethnic minorities, or low socioeconomic status were less likely to be recommended. Six themes underpinned nephrologists' perspectives: prioritizing individual benefit and safety, maximizing efficiency, patient accountability, justifying gains, protecting unit outcomes, and reluctance to raise patients' expectations. Evidence-based guidelines may support systematic and equitable decision-making. Interventions for high-risk or disadvantaged patient populations could reduce disparities in access to transplantation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Comorbidity
  • Decision Making
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Health Services Accessibility*
  • Humans
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / surgery*
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Life Style
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrology / methods*
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Participation
  • Physicians
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Quality of Life
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Social Class
  • Vulnerable Populations