Medico-economic evaluation of healthcare products. Methodology for defining a significant impact on French health insurance costs and selection of benchmarks for interpreting results
Therapie. 2014 Jul-Aug;69(4):323-8.
doi: 10.2515/therapie/2014048.
Epub 2014 Aug 12.
[Article in
English,
French]
Authors
Benoît Dervaux
1
, Eric Baseilhac
2
, Jean-Yves Fagon
3
; participants of round table n4 of Giens XXIX : Biot Claire 4 Blachier Corinne 5 Braun Eric 6 Debrou; Claire Biot
4
, Corinne Blachier
5
, Eric Braun
6
, Frédérique Debroucker
7
, Bruno Detournay
8
, Carine Ferretti
3
, Muriel Granger
9
, Chrystel Jouan-Flahault
10
, Marie-Dominique Lussier
11
, Arlette Meyer
12
, Sophie Muller
13
, Martine Pigeon
14
, Rima De Sahb
15
, Thomas Sannié
16
, Claudine Sapède
17
, Muriel Vray
18
Affiliations
- 1 Délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation, CHRU, Lille, France.
- 2 Laboratoire Lilly, Neuilly sur Seine, France.
- 3 Comité économique des produits de santé, Paris, France.
- 4 Direction de la sécurité sociale, Paris, France.
- 5 AMGEN, Neuilly sur Seine, France.
- 6 Laboratoire Janssen Cilag, Issy les Moulineaux, France.
- 7 Medtronic, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
- 8 CEMKA-EVAL, Bourg la Reine, France.
- 9 Boston Scientific, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France.
- 10 LEEM, Paris, France.
- 11 ANAP, Paris, France.
- 12 Direction générale de la santé, Paris, France.
- 13 GlaxoSmithKline, Marly le Roy, France.
- 14 CNAMTS, Paris, France.
- 15 MSD-Chibret, Courbevoie, France.
- 16 Association française des hémophiles, Paris, France.
- 17 Laboratoire Roche, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
- 18 Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Abstract
Decree No. 2012-1116 of 2 October 2012 on medico-economic assignments of the French National Authority for Health (Haute autorité de santé, HAS) significantly alters the conditions for accessing the health products market in France. This paper presents a theoretical framework for interpreting the results of the economic evaluation of health technologies and summarises the facts available in France for developing benchmarks that will be used to interpret incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. This literature review shows that it is difficult to determine a threshold value but it is also difficult to interpret then incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) results without a threshold value. In this context, round table participants favour a pragmatic approach based on "benchmarks" as opposed to a threshold value, based on an interpretative and normative perspective, i.e. benchmarks that can change over time based on feedback.
© 2014 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.
MeSH terms
-
Benchmarking / standards*
-
Biomedical Technology / economics
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis*
-
Delivery of Health Care / economics*
-
Equipment and Supplies / economics*
-
France
-
Government Agencies / legislation & jurisprudence*
-
Inventions / economics
-
National Health Programs / economics*
-
Pharmaceutical Preparations / economics*
-
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Substances
-
Pharmaceutical Preparations