[RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches]

Prog Urol. 2015 Jan;25(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.08.237. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Introduction: Due to its technical ease and greater precision Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy (RALP) allows a better preservation of the neurovascular bundles, thereby improving functional outcomes. The intrafascial dissection has been proposed to allow a more complete preservation of these bundles. However, this technique harbors a high rate of positive surgical margins, justifying another trend: the interfascial approach. To date, there are still few publications directly comparing these 2 techniques and our study is the first to offer a 2-year follow-up.

Materials and methods: Our study focused on a two-hundred patients population divided into two consecutive groups. All the patients were continent preoperatively and had a satisfactory IIEF5 score: (1) Group 1 consisted of 100 patients who underwent RALP with the intrafascial approach. They had a mean age of 60.3 years (45-70). The majority of cancers were of the low or moderate risk group of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 7.43ng/ml. Seventy-five patients had a pT2, 24 a pT3 and one patient had a pT4. (2) Group 2 included 100 patients who underwent RALP with the interfascial technique. Patients had a mean age of 61.6±5.96 years (45-72), and their cancers were mostly of the low or moderate risk groups of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 6.3ng/ml. Seventy-four patients had a pT2, 22 a pT3a, and 4 had a pT3b. All patients were evaluated after one and two years of follow-up.

Result: Rates of positive surgical margins were 45% and 19% respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P<0.0001). The rates of biochemical failure (PSA>0.2ng/ml) at 2 years were 10% and 3%, respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0447). At 2 years, 2 patients in group 1 and one patient in group 2 were using 2 or more urinary pads. Erection with or without oral medication was maintained in 65 (65%) and 31 (31%) patients respectively for groups 1 and 2 at one year. At 2 years 86 and 65 patients were having spontaneous erection, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0006). In addition, 65 and 55 patients were also capable of sexual penetration, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0045).

Conclusion: The intrafascial approach exposed to a very high rate of positive surgical margins while offering only a little benefit in the erectile function preservation at 2 years compared to the interfascial variant. In our series, we did not notice any significant difference between the two techniques concerning the urinary continence.

Level of evidence: 5.

Keywords: Biochemical failure; Chirurgie robotique; Dysfonction érectile; Erectile dysfunction; Incontinence urinaire; Marges chirurgicales; Prostatectomie totale; Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy (RALP); Récidive biochimique; Surgical margins; Urinary incontinence.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incontinence Pads / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Penile Erection
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood
  • Prostatectomy / methods*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / complications
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Urinary Incontinence / etiology

Substances

  • Prostate-Specific Antigen