Diversity of Aquatic Pseudomonas Species and Their Activity against the Fish Pathogenic Oomycete Saprolegnia

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136241. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Emerging fungal and oomycete pathogens are increasingly threatening animals and plants globally. Amongst oomycetes, Saprolegnia species adversely affect wild and cultivated populations of amphibians and fish, leading to substantial reductions in biodiversity and food productivity. With the ban of several chemical control measures, new sustainable methods are needed to mitigate Saprolegnia infections in aquaculture. Here, PhyloChip-based community analyses showed that the Pseudomonadales, particularly Pseudomonas species, represent one of the largest bacterial orders associated with salmon eggs from a commercial hatchery. Among the Pseudomonas species isolated from salmon eggs, significantly more biosurfactant producers were retrieved from healthy salmon eggs than from Saprolegnia-infected eggs. Subsequent in vivo activity bioassays showed that Pseudomonas isolate H6 significantly reduced salmon egg mortality caused by Saprolegnia diclina. Live colony mass spectrometry showed that strain H6 produces a viscosin-like lipopeptide surfactant. This biosurfactant inhibited growth of Saprolegnia in vitro, but no significant protection of salmon eggs against Saprolegniosis was observed. These results indicate that live inocula of aquatic Pseudomonas strains, instead of their bioactive compound, can provide new (micro)biological and sustainable means to mitigate oomycete diseases in aquaculture.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Base Sequence
  • Biodiversity*
  • Eggs / microbiology
  • Fish Diseases / microbiology
  • Infections / microbiology
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Pseudomonas* / classification
  • Pseudomonas* / genetics
  • Pseudomonas* / isolation & purification
  • Salmon / microbiology
  • Saprolegnia / microbiology*
  • Water Microbiology*

Associated data

  • GENBANK/KP890304
  • GENBANK/KP890305
  • GENBANK/KP890306
  • GENBANK/KP890307
  • GENBANK/KP890308
  • GENBANK/KP890309
  • GENBANK/KP890310
  • GENBANK/KP890311
  • GENBANK/KP890312
  • GENBANK/KP890313
  • GENBANK/KP890314
  • GENBANK/KT223371
  • GENBANK/KT223372
  • GENBANK/KT223373
  • GENBANK/KT223374
  • GENBANK/KT223375
  • GENBANK/KT223376
  • GENBANK/KT223377
  • GENBANK/KT223378
  • GENBANK/KT223379
  • GENBANK/KT223380
  • GENBANK/KT223381
  • GENBANK/KT223382
  • GENBANK/KT223383
  • GENBANK/KT223384
  • GENBANK/KT223385
  • GENBANK/KT223386

Grants and funding

This work was financially supported by SAPRO (Sustainable Approaches to Reduce Oomycete (Saprolegnia) Infections in Aquaculture, 238550), a Marie Curie Initial Training Network funded by the European Commission under Framework Program 7; ParaFishControl (Advanced Tools and Research Strategies for Parasite Control in European farmed fish, 634429), a Research and Innovation action funded by the European Commission under HORIZON 2020; and BE-Basic Foundation (project number F07.003.01). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.