A number of theoretical and practical aspects of acute myocardial infarction suggest a potential role for ACE inhibition in enhancing coronary blood flow and limitation of infarct size. Indeed, the use of ACE inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction could be viewed as a logical intervention in the face of the neuroendocrine response which accompanies the acute phase. During the first 24 h post-infarction, very high plasma concentrations of arginine-vasopressin and catecholamines occur. This is followed by a sharp rise in the concentration of angiotensin II (ANG II) over the next few days. The neuroendocrine response is most marked in those patients with larger infarcts, who frequently develop left ventricular failure. The extent to which these factors influence coronary flow in acute myocardial infarction is unknown, although in chronic heart failure ACE inhibition does not reduce coronary blood flow despite a reduction in rate-pressure product, suggesting a coronary vasodilator effect. However, in the presence of fixed coronary stenoses, the fall in blood pressure and, therefore, of coronary perfusion pressure must be taken into account. Whether or not the use of ACE inhibitors can limit infarct size in man also remains to be determined, although it has been clearly demonstrated that concentrations of ANG II similar to those observed in the early phase of myocardial infarction can cause myocardial cell damage in experimental animals. Post-infarction ventricular enlargement can be reduced by ACE inhibitors. Additionally, ACE inhibitors, through their balanced vasodilator effect, maintain cardiac output whilst reducing filling pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)