The Use of DNA Barcoding on Recently Diverged Species in the Genus Gentiana (Gentianaceae) in China

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0153008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153008. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

DNA barcoding of plants poses particular challenges, especially in differentiating, recently diverged taxa. The genus Gentiana (Gentianaceae) is a species-rich plant group which rapidly radiated in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains in China. In this study, we tested the core plant barcode (rbcL + matK) and three promising complementary barcodes (trnH-psbA, ITS and ITS2) in 30 Gentiana species across 6 sections using three methods (the genetic distance-based method, Best Close Match and tree-based method). rbcL had the highest PCR efficiency and sequencing success (100%), while the lowest sequence recoverability was from ITS (68.35%). The presence of indels and inversions in trnH-psbA in Gentiana led to difficulties in sequence alignment. When using a single region for analysis, ITS exhibited the highest discriminatory power (60%-74.42%). Of the combinations, matK + ITS provided the highest discrimination success (71.43%-88.24%) and is recommended as the DNA barcode for the genus Gentiana. DNA barcoding proved effective in assigning most species to sections, though it performed poorly in some closely related species in sect. Cruciata because of hybridization events. Our analysis suggests that the status of G. pseudosquarrosa needs to be studied further. The utility of DNA barcoding was also verified in authenticating 'Qin-Jiao' Gentiana medicinal plants (G. macrophylla, G. crassicaulis, G. straminea, and G. dahurica), which can help ensure safe and correct usage of these well-known Chinese traditional medicinal herbs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • China
  • DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic*
  • DNA, Plant
  • Gentianaceae / classification
  • Gentianaceae / genetics*

Substances

  • DNA, Plant

Grants and funding

This work was funded by National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2014CB954100) [http://www.most.gov.cn/eng/programmes1/200610/t20061009_36223.htm]; the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (MOST Grant No. 2011FY120200) [http://www.most.gov.cn/eng/]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.