Filgrastim-Stimulated Bone Marrow Compared with Filgrastim-Mobilized Peripheral Blood in Myeloablative Sibling Allografting for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Randomized Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group Study

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Aug;22(8):1410-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

In adult hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB) has largely replaced unstimulated marrow for allografting. Although the use of G-PB results in faster hematopoietic recovery, it is also associated with more chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). A potential alternative allograft is filgrastim-stimulated marrow (G-BM), which we hypothesized may be associated with prompt hematopoietic recovery but with less cGVHD. We conducted a phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized trial of 230 adults with hematologic malignancies receiving allografts from siblings after myeloablative conditioning to compare G-PB with G-BM. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure, defined as a composite of extensive cGVHD, relapse/disease progression, and death. With a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 9.6 to 48), comparing G-BM with G-PB, there was no difference between the 2 arms with respect to the primary outcome of this study (hazard ratio [HR], .91; 95% confidence interval [CI], .68 to 1.22; P = .52). However, the cumulative incidence of overall cGVHD was lower with G-BM (HR, .66; 95% CI, .46 to .95; P = .007) and there was no difference in the risk of relapse or progression (P = .35). The median times to neutrophil recovery (P = .0004) and platelet recovery (P = .012) were 3 days shorter for recipients allocated to G-PB compared with those allocated to G-BM, but there were no differences in secondary engraftment-related outcomes, such as time to first hospital discharge (P = .17). In addition, there were no graft failures in either arm. This trial demonstrates that, compared with G-PB, the use of G-BM allografts leads to a significantly lower rate of overall cGVHD without a loss of the graft-versus-tumor effect and comparable overall survival. Our findings suggest that further study of this type of allograft is warranted.

Keywords: Blood and marrow transplantation; Donor source; Filgrastim; Graft-versus-host disease; Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Mobilized bone marrow.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bone Marrow / drug effects*
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation / methods*
  • Female
  • Filgrastim / pharmacology*
  • Graft Survival
  • Graft vs Host Disease / etiology
  • Hematologic Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myeloablative Agonists / therapeutic use
  • Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation / methods*
  • Siblings
  • Survival Rate
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Myeloablative Agonists
  • Filgrastim