[Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy : A pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument]

Nervenarzt. 2017 Jul;88(7):802-810. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0261-3.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Study objective: A simple instrument to record case-related coercive measures was tested as part of a pilot project of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN).

Methods: To assess coercive measures data were collected for 3 months in 8 German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy. The type of measures used, the main diagnosis and the legal basis for the coercive measures were documented.

Results: In the sample studied, coercive measures were applied in 8% of cases. Coercive measures were most commonly used in patients with a schizophrenic disorder. The principle of justifiable necessity according to § 34 of the German Penal Code was used particularly often as the legal basis for justifying the coercive measures.

Conclusion: Suitable measurement instruments and reliable data that enable the learning of best practices represent the basis for a reduction of coercive measures.

Keywords: Coercive measures; DGPPN; Legal basis; Psychiatry.

MeSH terms

  • Coercion*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Germany
  • Hospitals, Psychiatric* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders / epidemiology
  • Mental Disorders / psychology*
  • Mental Disorders / therapy*
  • Patient Isolation / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Pilot Projects
  • Psychometrics / statistics & numerical data*
  • Psychotherapy* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Restraint, Physical / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Schizophrenia / epidemiology
  • Schizophrenia / therapy
  • Schizophrenic Psychology
  • Societies, Medical
  • Substance-Related Disorders / epidemiology
  • Substance-Related Disorders / therapy