Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the ACURATE TA and ACURATE neo valves: a four-year single-centre experience

EuroIntervention. 2017 May 15;13(1):53-59. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00898.

Abstract

Aims: Long-term outcomes are available for first-generation transcatheter heart valves but data on second-generation devices are scarce. We aimed to provide an oversight of all patients implanted with a second-generation valve in our centre.

Methods and results: From April 2012 to July 2016, 219 patients were enrolled in this prospective single-centre experience; they received either the transapical ACURATE TA (n=99) or the transfemoral ACURATE neo (n=120) prosthesis. Data were collected during the hospital stay and telephone follow-ups were conducted at 30 days post procedure and annually thereafter. Patients were 80.9±4.4 years old with a mean logistic EuroSCORE I of 19.3±13.9%. Transapical patients had significantly more comorbidities at baseline. Post intervention, mean gradient was reduced to 10.6±9.2 mmHg, and 1.9% had moderate paravalvular regurgitation. Mean follow-up time, based on the last patient contact, was 217±188 days for the transfemoral and 525±413 days for the transapical group. Thirty-day mortality was 2.5% and 4.0%, and one-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 94.8% (95% CI: 87.5-97.9) and 81.9% (95% CI: 72.0-88.5), respectively. At two years, survival was 64.9% (95% CI: 52.6-74.7) for transapical patients.

Conclusions: This early single-centre experience showed very good safety and performance outcomes in patients treated with the ACURATE prostheses.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / surgery*
  • Cardiac Catheterization / methods
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation* / methods
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome