Interactions between synaptic homeostatic mechanisms: an attempt to reconcile BCM theory, synaptic scaling, and changing excitation/inhibition balance

Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017 Apr:43:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

Abstract

Homeostatic plasticity is proposed to be mediated by synaptic changes, such as synaptic scaling and shifts in the excitation/inhibition balance. These mechanisms are thought to be separate from the Bienenstock, Cooper, Munro (BCM) learning rule, where the threshold for the induction of long-term potentiation and long-term depression slides in response to changes in activity levels. Yet, both sets of mechanisms produce a homeostatic response of a relative increase (or decrease) in strength of excitatory synapses in response to overall activity-level changes. Here we review recent studies, with a focus on in vivo experiments, to re-examine the overlap and differences between these two mechanisms and we suggest how they may interact to facilitate firing-rate homeostasis, while maintaining functional properties of neurons.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Homeostasis*
  • Long-Term Potentiation / physiology*
  • Neural Inhibition / physiology
  • Neuronal Plasticity / physiology*
  • Neurons / physiology*
  • Synapses / physiology*