Controversies and Challenges in the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Interv Cardiol Clin. 2016 Oct;5(4):541-549. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

Abstract

The prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has improved with coronary care units, revascularization, and anticoagulant strategies; however, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a highly fatal condition. Controversies remain about optimal pharmacologic therapies, revascularization strategies, the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and evidence-based patient selection. The current informed consent paradigm for clinical trials creates challenges testing treatments in CS patients, who are too ill to consent and require immediate treatment. Several trials are underway comparing revascularization strategies and MCS options. Although the prognosis is grim, careful, new and existing treatments could change the course of this condition in the coming years.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Mechanical circulatory support; Revascularization; ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Care Units / standards*
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Revascularization / methods*
  • Prognosis
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / complications*
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • Shock, Cardiogenic / etiology*
  • Shock, Cardiogenic / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome