Performance evaluation of three platforms with ultrasensitive ligand-binding assay potential

Bioanalysis. 2017 Jun;9(12):937-946. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0024. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated three immunoassay-based technologies and their biomarker kits, by determining precision, parallelism and detectability of analytes of interest.

Materials & methods: We compared ultrasensitive assays for three biomarkers: interleukins IL-6, IL-13 and IL-17A using kits obtained from Roche (IMPACT platform - proprietary platform), Singulex (Erenna®) and Quanterix (Simoa). We defined the true LLOD as the LLOQs, and provided disease-specific parallelism results and detectability levels for endogenous analyte, which were good across platforms, though they varied from analyte to analyte.

Conclusion: We highlight a simplified approach employed for evaluating ultrasensitive kits and provide an overview of the methodologies used to compare available assays. All three platforms are able to detect very low-level analytes. We recommend all three platforms for detection of very low-level analytes.

Keywords: biomarker; immunoassay; ligand-binding assay; parallelism; platform comparison; ultrasensitive.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Cytokines / analysis
  • Cytokines / immunology
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods*
  • Ligands

Substances

  • Cytokines
  • Ligands