Abstract
Aim:
To assess the efficacy of second-line sunitinib therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with different exon 11 mutation genotypes.
Patients & methods:
Thirty eight of the 75 patients received imatinib (IM) dose escalation followed by sunitinib (IM escalation group), while 37 were switched to sunitinib directly after the failure of first-line IM treatment (sunitinib group). Progression-free survival and overall survival were compared.
Results:
The median progression-free survival in the sunitinib group was significantly longer than in the IM escalation group (14 vs 4 months; p < 0.001), so was in patients with exon 11 deletions (16 vs 3 months; p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Patients who have an exon 11 deletion mutation are more likely to benefit from switching to sunitinib directly than from IM dose escalation.
Keywords:
exon 11 deletion mutation; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; imatinib dose escalation; sunitinib.
MeSH terms
-
Adult
-
Aged
-
Angiogenesis Inhibitors / administration & dosage
-
Angiogenesis Inhibitors / adverse effects
-
Angiogenesis Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
-
Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage
-
Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
-
Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
-
Combined Modality Therapy
-
Disease Progression
-
Drug Substitution
-
Exons*
-
Female
-
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors / drug therapy*
-
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors / genetics*
-
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors / mortality
-
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors / pathology
-
Genotype*
-
Humans
-
Indoles / administration & dosage
-
Indoles / adverse effects
-
Indoles / therapeutic use*
-
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
-
Male
-
Middle Aged
-
Mutation*
-
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
-
Prognosis
-
Pyrroles / administration & dosage
-
Pyrroles / adverse effects
-
Pyrroles / therapeutic use*
-
Sunitinib
-
Treatment Failure
-
Treatment Outcome
Substances
-
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
-
Antineoplastic Agents
-
Indoles
-
Pyrroles
-
Sunitinib