Background: The duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are an extremely rare subset of GISTs. The optimal surgical procedure remains not well defined.
Aims: We assessed the surgical approach and long-term outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent limited resection (LR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods: From November 2005 to January 2016, 64 consecutive patients with duodenal GISTs in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and perioperative outcomes were analyzed according to the different surgical type.
Results: A total of 41 patients (64.1%) underwent LR, while 23 patients (35.9%) underwent PD. All patients had negative surgical margins (R0). Median tumor size was larger for PD (6 cm) versus LR (4 cm) (P = 0.041). PD also had more complications than LR (PD, 69.6 vs. LR, 31.7%) (P = 0.002). The 3-year and 5-year RFS was 62.9 and 44.3%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year OS was 85.7 and 59.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated the only unfavorable predictive factor was tumor size >5 cm for RFS and OS. Although the complication rate in the PD group was higher than in the LR group, OS and RFS were not affected by the complication (P = 0.492 for OS, P = 0.512 for RFS). PD versus LR was not associated with RFS and OS. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) did not improve the survival of the patients after operation.
Conclusions: Survival of duodenal GISTs is mainly dependent on tumor biology rather than surgical procedure. LR should be the surgical procedure of choice for duodenal GISTs when technically feasible and no anatomical constrains. LR shows comparable survival and lower risk of postoperative complications compared by PD. The administration of IM both as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for duodenal GISTs needs large population and prospective study to evaluate its effect.
Keywords: Duodenal GISTs; Imatinib mesylate; Limited resection; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Surgery.