Attitudes of Palestinian Health-Care Professionals in Gaza to Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Mahmoud Radwan; Ali Akbari Sari; Arash Rashidian; Amirhossein Takian; Sanaa Abou-Dagga; Aymen Elsous

doi:10.3389/fendo.2017.00288

Attitudes of Palestinian Health-Care Professionals in Gaza to Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Oct 31:8:288. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00288. eCollection 2017.

Authors

Mahmoud Radwan^{1

2}, Ali Akbari Sari¹, Arash Rashidian¹, Amirhossein Takian^{1

3}, Sanaa Abou-Dagga⁴, Aymen Elsous¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IC-TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
² International Cooperation Directorate, Palestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza City, Palestine.
³ Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
⁴ Department of Research Affairs and Graduates Studies, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza City, Palestine.

Abstract

Background: Despite the huge numbers of the internationally produced and implemented Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), the compliance with them is still low in health care. This study aimed at assessing the attitudes of Palestinian health-care professionals toward the most perceived factors influencing the adherence to the CPG for Diabetes Mellitus in the Primary Health-care centers of the Ministry of Health (PHC-MoH) and the Primary Health-care centers of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (PHC-UNRWA) using a validated questionnaire.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed with a census sample of all Palestinian family doctors and nurses (n = 323). The Cabana theoretical framework was used to develop a study questionnaire. A cross cultural adaptation framework was followed to develop the Arabic version questionnaire. The psychometric properties of Arabic version were finally assessed.

Results: The Arabic version questionnaire showed a good construct validity and internal consistency reliability. The overall adherence level to the diabetic guideline was disappointingly suboptimal 51.5% (47.3% in the PHC-MoH and 55.5% in the PHC-UNRWA) P = 0.000. The most frequently perceived barriers in the PHC-MoH were lack of incentives, lack of resources, and lack of guideline trustworthiness, whereas the lack of time and the lack of guideline trustworthiness were the most prominent barriers in the PHC-UNRWA. In spite of the lack of trustworthiness of the diabetic guideline, most respondents in both settings had a positive attitude toward guidelines in general, but this attitude was not a predictor of guideline adherence.

Conclusion: The good validity and reliability of our questionnaire can provide support for the accuracy of our findings. Multifaceted implementation strategies targeting the main barriers elicited from this study are required for addressing the lack of incentives, organizational resources, lack of confidence in the guideline, and time constraints.

Keywords: adherence; barriers; clinical practice guideline; diabetes mellitus; psychometric properties.