Low-dose valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in intermediate-risk liver transplantation recipients

Liver Transpl. 2018 May;24(5):616-622. doi: 10.1002/lt.25047.

Abstract

Liver transplantation recipients (LTRs) who are seropositive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) (recipient seropositive [R+]) are at intermediate risk for CMV disease. A preventative strategy following transplant is considered standard of care. Current guidelines recommend high-dose valganciclovir (VGCV; 900 mg/day adjusted for renal function) for prophylaxis given limited data on the efficacy and safety of low-dose VGCV (450 mg/day adjusted for renal function). We describe our experience using low-dose VGCV prophylaxis for R+ LTRs at our institution. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted using a database of 364 LTRs over a 4-year period (2011-2014). Adult first-time R+ LTRs receiving low-dose VGCV prophylaxis were included. The primary endpoint was CMV disease at 1 year after transplant. Patients were compared with historical controls receiving high-dose VGCV prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints were biopsy-proven rejection and leukopenia on VGCV. With respect to leukopenia, patients receiving low-dose VGCV were compared with a group of D+R- patients from the database receiving high-dose VGCV. Univariate analyses were performed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A total of 200 R+ LTRs met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-66 years), and 129 (65%) LTRs were male. Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 22 (IQR, 14-31), and 178 (89%) patients received deceased donor transplants. CMV disease occurred in only 9 (5%) patients, similar to rates in previous studies of LTRs receiving high-dose VGCV. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 18 (9%) patients. Patients received VGCV prophylaxis for a median of 3.4 (IQR, 3.1-4.3) months; 151 (76%) R+ LTRs receiving low-dose VGCV developed leukopenia. Premature VGCV discontinuation and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use were infrequent and not significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, low-dose VGCV was safe and effective for prevention of CMV disease in our cohort of 200 R+ LTR and should be considered as an option in future guidelines. Liver Transplantation 24 616-622 2018 AASLD.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antiviral Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antiviral Agents / adverse effects
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / immunology
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / prevention & control*
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / virology
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Ganciclovir / administration & dosage
  • Ganciclovir / adverse effects
  • Ganciclovir / analogs & derivatives*
  • Graft Rejection / immunology
  • Graft Rejection / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / adverse effects
  • Leukopenia / chemically induced
  • Liver Transplantation / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New York City
  • Opportunistic Infections / diagnosis
  • Opportunistic Infections / immunology
  • Opportunistic Infections / prevention & control*
  • Opportunistic Infections / virology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Valganciclovir

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Valganciclovir
  • Ganciclovir