A comparison of gait one year post operation in an RCT of robotic UKA versus traditional Oxford UKA

Gait Posture. 2018 May:62:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

Abstract

Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee surgery has been shown to improve the accuracy of implant alignment. However, little research has been conducted to ascertain if this results in a measureable improvement in knee function post operatively and a more normal gait. The kinematics of 70 OA knees were assessed using motion analysis in an RCT (31 receiving robotic-assisted surgery, and 39 receiving traditional manual surgery) and compared to healthy knees. Statistically significant kinematic differences were seen between the two surgical groups from foot-strike to mid-stance. The robotic-assisted group achieved a higher knee excursion (18.0°, SD 4.9°) compared to the manual group (15.7°, SD 4.1°). There were no significant difference between the healthy group and the robotic assisted group, however there was a significant difference between the healthy group and the manual group (p < 0.001). Hence robotically-assisted knee replacement with Mako Restoris Implants appears to lead not only to better implant alignment but also some kinematic benefits to the user during gait.

Keywords: Gait; Kinematics; Robotic-assisted arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee replacement; Walking.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gait / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / physiopathology*
  • Knee Joint / surgery
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / physiopathology*
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / surgery
  • Postoperative Period
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Time Factors