The Ups and Downs of Cognitive Function: Neuroticism and Negative Affect Drive Performance Inconsistency

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 14;75(2):263-273. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby032.

Abstract

Objectives: Response time inconsistency (RTI)-or trial-to-trial variability in speeded performance-is increasingly recognized as an indicator of transient lapses of attention, cognitive health status, and central nervous system integrity, as well as a potential early indicator of normal and pathological cognitive aging. Comparatively, little research has examined personality predictors of RTI across adulthood.

Methods: We evaluated the association between the personality trait neuroticism and RTI in a community-dwelling sample of 317 adults between the ages of 19-83 and tested for two indirect pathways through negative affect (NA) and cognitive interference (CI).

Results: The personality trait neuroticism predicted greater RTI independent of mean response time performance and demographic covariates; the results were age-invariant. Furthermore, NA (but not CI) accounted for this association and moderated mediation model results indicated that older adults were more vulnerable to the adverse effects of NA.

Discussion: Neuroticism predicts greater RTI irrespective of mean performance and this effect is driven largely by heightened negative emotionality that may be particularly detrimental for older adults.

Keywords: Cognition; Inconsistency; Neuroticism; Personality; Response time.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Affect*
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cognition*
  • Cognitive Aging / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuroticism*
  • Personality Inventory
  • Reaction Time
  • Young Adult