Objective: A variety of advanced biological therapies are available for the treatment of chronic wounds such as venous leg ulcers (VLUs), but real-world comparative effectiveness data that can help guide decisions around treatments are currently lacking. Approach: This analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct (BLCC) to a cryopreserved cadaveric skin allograft (CCSA) for the treatment of VLUs. Treatment records were collected from a large wound care-specific electronic medical record database on 717 patients (799 VLUs) receiving treatment at 177 wound care centers. Ulcers ≥28 days duration, between ≥1 and < 40 cm2 that closed ≤40% within the 28 days before treatment were included. Results: Patient baseline demographics and wound characteristics were comparable between groups. The median time to wound closure was 52% faster with BLCC compared with CCSA (15 weeks vs. 31 weeks). In addition, the proportion of wounds healed were significantly higher for BLCC by 12 weeks (42% vs. 24%) and 24 weeks (65% vs. 41%) (p = 0.0002). Treatment with BLCC increased the probability of healing by 97% compared with CCSA (hazard ratio = 1.97 [95% confidence interval 1.39-2.79], p = 0.0002). Innovation: This is the first real-world comparative effectiveness analysis to evaluate BLCC and CCSA for the treatment of VLUs. Conclusion: Treatment with a bioengineered cellular technology significantly improved the incidence and speed of wound closure compared with a CCSA.
Keywords: bioengineered living cellular construct; cryopreserved cadaveric skin allograft; skin substitute; venous leg ulcer; wound healing.