Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195034. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9-10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequences (121,016 base pairs; from 90 accessions representing 55 Corymbia and 8 Angophora species, plus 33 accessions of related genera), skimmed from high throughput sequencing of genomic DNA, and compare results with new analyses of nuclear ITS sequences (119 accessions) from previous studies. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses of cpDNA resolve well supported trees with most nodes having >95% bootstrap support. These trees strongly reject monophyly of Corymbia, its two subgenera (Corymbia and Blakella), most taxonomic sections (Abbreviatae, Maculatae, Naviculares, Septentrionales), and several species. ITS trees weakly indicate paraphyly of Corymbia (bootstrap support <50% for maximum likelihood, and 71% for parsimony), but are highly incongruent with the cpDNA analyses, in that they support monophyly of both subgenera and some taxonomic sections of Corymbia. The striking incongruence between cpDNA trees and both morphological taxonomy and ITS trees is attributed largely to chloroplast introgression between taxa, because of geographic sharing of chloroplast clades across taxonomic groups. Such introgression has been widely inferred in studies of the related genus Eucalyptus. This is the first report of its likely prevalence in Corymbia and Angophora, but this is consistent with previous morphological inferences of hybridisation between species. Our findings (based on continent-wide sampling) highlight a need for more focussed studies to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression in the evolutionary history of these genera, and that critical testing of the classification of Corymbia and Angophora requires additional sequence data from nuclear genomes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • DNA, Chloroplast / genetics*
  • DNA, Ribosomal / genetics
  • Genetic Variation*
  • Myrtaceae / classification*
  • Myrtaceae / genetics*
  • Phylogeny
  • Phylogeography
  • Plant Leaves / genetics
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA

Substances

  • DNA, Chloroplast
  • DNA, Ribosomal

Grants and funding

This research was funded by The Hermon Slade Foundation (grant HSF14-09 to TMS and JFGT; http://www.hermonslade.org.au), The Bjarne K. Dahl Trust (grants in 2014 and 2015 to MJB and PKA; https://dahltrust.org.au), and The University of Melbourne Botany Foundation (TMS support funds; http://science.unimelb.edu.au/engage/giving-to-science/botany-foundation). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.