Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in children and adolescents with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: The first real-world evaluation in Asian pediatric neurology clinics

Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Aug:85:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

Aim: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with epilepsy whose seizures are pharmacoresistant to existing antiepileptic drugs.

Methods: A clinical retrospective study was conducted from 2016 to 2017 in the pediatric neurology clinic at a tertiary children's hospital. We reviewed the data obtained from 66 children whose seizures were pharmacoresistant to more than two antiepileptic drugs, and could be followed up for a minimum of 3 months after PER adjunctive therapy initiation. The efficacy was estimated by the PER response rate at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up evaluations, and adverse events were also recorded.

Results: The rate of seizure reduction of >50% was 30.3%, 37.5%, and 34.7% for all seizure types at 3, 6, and 12 months, in which 7.6%, 8.9%, and 14.3% of the patients became seizure-free at these time points, respectively. No significant differences were found between enzyme-inducing and nonenzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs in combination with PER with regard to the responder rate. Five patients with Dravet syndrome were included in the study. Four of them (80%) exhibited 50% seizure reduction at the last visit, at which point, two patients (40.0%) were seizure-free. The retention rate was 51% at 12 months. Adverse events were documented in 25 patients (35.7%) and led to PER discontinuation in eight patients (12.1%). The most common adverse events comprised irritability, skin rash, dizziness, and somnolence; however, all were transient and successfully managed after PER dose reduction or discontinuation.

Conclusion: The current data support the value of adjunctive PER in child and adolescent patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy in daily clinical practice. Perampanel was efficacious and generally well-tolerated as an add-on treatment for epilepsy.

Keywords: Adolescent; Children; Efficacy; Epilepsy; Perampanel; Tolerability.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities / trends
  • Anticonvulsants / adverse effects
  • Anticonvulsants / therapeutic use*
  • Asian People*
  • Child
  • Dizziness / chemically induced
  • Drug Resistant Epilepsy / diagnosis
  • Drug Resistant Epilepsy / drug therapy*
  • Drug Resistant Epilepsy / epidemiology*
  • Epilepsies, Myoclonic / diagnosis
  • Epilepsies, Myoclonic / drug therapy
  • Epilepsies, Myoclonic / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neurology / methods
  • Neurology / trends
  • Nitriles
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / trends*
  • Pediatrics / methods
  • Pediatrics / trends
  • Pyridones / adverse effects
  • Pyridones / therapeutic use*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rett Syndrome / diagnosis
  • Rett Syndrome / drug therapy
  • Rett Syndrome / epidemiology
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticonvulsants
  • Nitriles
  • Pyridones
  • perampanel