Background: Transtibial hydrocast sockets have been shown to be a potential alternative to hand-cast patella-tendon bearing sockets, the use of which would have particular benefits in under-resourced environments. However, data concerning wearer outcomes of hard hydrocast sockets (i.e. those without silicone liners), especially over long-term usage periods, is scarce in the literature.
Research questions: Are there any changes in wearer functional, spatio-temporal or satisfaction outcomes over a long usage period with a hydrocast socket? And how do the post-usage period outcomes compare with those from the wearers original prostheses?
Methods: In this pre-post interventional study, the clinical outcomes of twenty-one experienced transtibial prostheses users were evaluated using widely-accepted and employed methods to assess wearer functional capacity, mobility, gait and satisfaction. The participants were fit with a hard hydrocast socket and the outcomes after an extensive usage period of 5 months were compared to the pre-usage period data following initial fitting and the data collected from the participants' original prosthetic limb.
Results: Significant differences were found in the temporal parameters of gait, all indicating decreased reliance on the intact limb and an increased loading of the prosthetic limb with the post-usage period hydrocast socket compared to both the pre-usage period socket and the participants' original limbs. No differences in the functional capacity, mobility, spatial gait parameters or satisfaction were found between the socket conditions.
Significance: This is the largest study to date of functional, spatio-temporal and satisfaction outcomes of hydrocast sockets following an extended usage period in an under-resourced environment.
Keywords: Developing countries; Pressure-casting; Prosthetic socket; Transtibial amputations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.