Author Correction: Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus

Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 22;8(1):17410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35443-y.

¹ Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. admckown@gmail.com.
² Department of Dendrology and Forest Tree Breeding, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, 165 21, Czech Republic.
³ Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, 3046, New Zealand.
⁴ Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
⁵ Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0X2, Canada.
⁶ United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Corn and Soybean Research, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.
⁷ Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
⁸ Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
⁹ Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Abstract

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.