Comparison study on the performance of two different gas-permeable membranes used in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25:658:1219-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.121. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

Abstract

This study compared the performance of two different gas-permeable membranes, PVDF and PP membrane, in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR). The surface characteristics and membrane pore blocking of these two membrane materials were studied utilizing AFM, SEM and CLSM. The PVDF membrane surface was more rough and hydrophilic, and possessed a better microbial affinity compared to PP. Furthermore, the MABR equipped with a PVDF membrane removed more COD (97.06 ± 0.97%) and TN (85.66 ± 0.87%) compared to the MABR with PP membrane (87.13 ± 0.87% and 71.13 ± 0.71%, respectively). As well, the PP membrane exhibited severe membrane pore blocking and had a lower oxygen transfer rate than the PVDF membrane. It is concluded that the PVDF membrane has potential as an aeration membrane material for MABRs.

Keywords: Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM); Membrane material; Membrane pore blocking; Membrane surface morphology; Membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR); Oxygen transfer rate.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Biofilms*
  • Biomass*
  • Bioreactors*
  • Carbon / analysis*
  • Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Nitrogen / analysis*
  • Porosity
  • Waste Disposal, Fluid

Substances

  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Carbon
  • Nitrogen