Purpose: Rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (RR-NSVT) that meets detection criteria but terminates itself before the delivery of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is not rare in routine ICD interrogation. Whether sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation will occur in a short time after RR-NSVT has not been fully elucidated.
Methods: Clinical features and follow-up data of 828 ICD patients with home monitoring were retrospectively collected. RR-NSVT characteristics and time interval between the first episode of RR-NSVT and subsequent appropriate ICD therapy were analyzed.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 44.75 ± 20.87 months, 335 episodes of RR-NSVT were documented in 145 patients. A total of 119 patients had both RR-NSVT and appropriate ICD therapy. In multivariate COX regression models, RR-NSVT was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy (HR 7.599, 95%CI 5.926-9.745, P < 0.001), appropriate shock (HR 6.222, 95%CI 4.667-8.294, P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality (HR 2.156, 95%CI 1.499-3.099, P < 0.001). Appropriate ICD therapy was administered after the first RR-NSVT episode in 101 patients, with a median interval of 21 days. Compared to RR-NSVT with appropriate ICD therapy occurring beyond 21 days, RR-NSVT within 21 days prior to appropriate ICD therapy had a longer median duration time (14 s vs. 12 s, P = 0.013), but without significant difference in mean RR interval at initial detection and mean RR interval after episode termination.
Conclusions: Rapid-rate non-sustained VT was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause mortality. The presence of RR-NSVT should be considered a possible herald of more serious cardiac events in ICD patients.
Keywords: Home monitoring; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Sudden cardiac death; Ventricular arrhythmia.