Implementing a fracture follow-up liaison service: perspective of key stakeholders

Rheumatol Int. 2020 Apr;40(4):607-614. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04413-6. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

Abstract

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been shown to prevent efficiently subsequent fragility fractures (FF). However, very few studies have examined their implementation in depth. The purpose of this research was to identify factors influencing the implementation of a FLS at three sites in Quebec, Canada. From 2013 to 2015, individual and group interviews focused on experiences of FLS stakeholders, including implementation committee members, coordinators, and orthopaedic surgeons and their teams. Emerging key implementation factors were triangulated with the FLS patients' clinico-administrative data. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the analysis of perceived factors influencing four intervention outputs: investigation of FF risk (using the FRAX score), communication with the participant primary care provider, initiation of anti-osteoporosis medications (when relevant), and referral to organized fall prevention activities (either governmental or community based). Among the 454 FLS patients recruited to the intervention group, 83% were investigated for FF risk, communication with the primary care provider was established for 98% of the participants, 54% initiated medication, and 35% were referred to organized fall prevention activities. Challenges related to restricted rights to prescribe medication and access to organized fall prevention activities were reported. FLS coordinator characteristics to overcome those challenges included self-efficacy beliefs, knowledge of community resources, and professional background. This study highlighted the importance of enabling access to services for subsequent FF prevention, consolidating the coordinator's role to facilitate a more integrated intervention, and involving local leaders to promote the successful implementation of the FLS.

Keywords: Bone; Fracture liaison service; Fractures; Implementation science; Osteoporosis; Program evaluation; Qualitative method.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Accidental Falls / prevention & control*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / organization & administration*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoporosis / diagnosis
  • Osteoporotic Fractures / prevention & control*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quebec
  • Risk Assessment / methods