The strong case for government funding of a polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in New Zealand

N Z Med J. 2019 Sep 20;132(1502):77-83.

Abstract

Wald and Law, who popularised the term 'polypill' in 2003, proposed giving everyone above a certain age a polypill to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A more compelling potential application, proposed in 2001 by the World Health Organization, is to use a polypill containing antiplatelet, statin and blood pressure-lowering therapy among people with established CVD, in whom the components are already indicated but in whom guideline implementation and adherence are suboptimal. This article outlines relevant international and New Zealand evidence on the likely benefits and harms of a polypill for the secondary prevention of CVD. The evidence indicates that the benefits are likely to outweigh the harms, particularly given the persistence of substantial treatment gaps and inequities in the management of and outcomes in CVD. The time is long overdue for the polypill to be funded for the secondary prevention of CVD.

MeSH terms

  • Antihypertensive Agents / pharmacology*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases* / drug therapy
  • Cardiovascular Diseases* / epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases* / prevention & control
  • Drug Combinations
  • Government Regulation
  • Humans
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / pharmacology*
  • New Zealand / epidemiology
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / pharmacology*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Risk Assessment
  • Secondary Prevention* / economics
  • Secondary Prevention* / methods
  • Secondary Prevention* / organization & administration
  • Tablets

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Drug Combinations
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Tablets