Comparison of Digital Widefield Retinal Imaging With Indirect Ophthalmoscopy in Pediatric Patients

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Sep 1;50(9):580-585. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20190905-07.

Abstract

Background and objective: Approximately 16,000 children in the United States lose vision each year because of retinal disease. The authors compare digital ultra-widefield (UWF) photography to indirect ophthalmoscopy in children.

Patients and methods: Prospective, single-center study of patients ages 3 to 17 years. Retinal area during indirect ophthalmoscopy was compared with retinal area in digital UWF fundus photographs. Image quality was graded. A survey to assess the usefulness of the retinal image was obtained.

Results: The retinal area (mean ± standard deviation, mm2) evaluated with indirect ophthalmoscopy was 413 ± 194 mm2, compared with 652 ± 117 mm2 with widefield photography (P < .001). The difference was largest in children younger than 14. Image quality was significantly associated with patient cooperation.

Conclusions: High-quality UWF photographs evaluate more peripheral retina than the in-office dilated funduscopic exam in children under 14. Photography assisted with family counseling in 17% of patients and the avoidance of examination under anesthesia in 2% of patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:580-585.].

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ophthalmoscopy / methods*
  • Photography / methods*
  • Physical Examination
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retinal Diseases / diagnostic imaging*