Impact of multiple sclerosis phenotypes on burden of disease in Finland

J Med Econ. 2020 Feb;23(2):156-165. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1682004. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to quantify how multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotypes differ from each other in respect of costs and quality-of-life.Materials and methods: The study is based on survey data from Finnish patients with MS (n = 553). The information contained disease type, disease severity according to self-reported Expanded Disease Severity Scale (EDSS), healthcare resource use, and medication use. In addition, information related to employment and early retirement was collected. EQ-5D-VAS and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) instruments were used to collect quality-of-life data, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) instrument for evaluating fatigue. Patients were stratified based on their disease type (relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS)) and disease severity. The data were primarily analyzed using summary statistics.Results: SPMS had the highest annual total cost (71,177€) followed by PPMS (51,082€) and RRMS (36,492€). Early retirement covered the greatest share of costs in RRMS (39%) and SPMS (43%). In PPMS, early retirement and professional care were the two most equally important cost drivers, contributing together 56% of the total costs. Direct healthcare costs were responsible for 33%, 19%, and 18% of total costs in RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS. The mean EDSS in RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS were 2.5, 5.5, and 5.9, respectively. Differences in the quality-of-life were observed with both disease specific (MSIS-29) and generic (EQ-5D-VAS) instruments. The mean utility value from EQ-5D among patients with RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS was 0.76, 0.52, and 0.49, respectively. In addition, patients with SPMS and PPMS were more likely to report fatigue than patients with RRMS.Conclusions: MS phenotype has an impact on costs and quality-of-life of the patients. Early retirement seems to be one of the most important contributors to MS-related costs.

Keywords: I10; I19; Multiple sclerosis; costs; disease modifying treatments; primary progressive MS; quality-of-life; relapsing remitting MS; secondary progressive MS.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Employment / economics
  • Employment / statistics & numerical data
  • Fatigue / economics
  • Female
  • Finland
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Resources / economics*
  • Health Resources / statistics & numerical data
  • Health Services / economics
  • Health Services / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis / classification*
  • Multiple Sclerosis / economics*
  • Phenotype
  • Quality of Life*
  • Retirement / economics
  • Retirement / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Young Adult