Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9.

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations.

Methods: The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making.

Results: GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success".

Conclusions: A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments.

Trial registration: Name of the registry: ISRCTN.

Trial registration number: 15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.

Keywords: General practice; Musculoskeletal pain; Primary care; Prognosis; Stratified care.

Publication types

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Clinical Decision-Making*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • General Practice
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Musculoskeletal Pain / therapy*
  • Nonprescription Drugs / therapeutic use
  • Pain Clinics
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Patient Selection*
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Pilot Projects
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Prognosis
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Rheumatology
  • Selection Bias
  • Self-Management
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Analgesics
  • Nonprescription Drugs

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN15366334