Early-start and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a Chinese cohort study on outcome

Ren Fail. 2020 Nov;42(1):305-313. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1743310.

Abstract

Background: Early-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective option for patients need unplanned dialysis. However, there are few studies on the long-term prognosis of early-start PD patients.Methods: In this retrospective study, 635 eligible patients from 1 March 1996 to 30 September 2016 were included, and divided into three groups according to the duration of break-in period: 3 days or less, 4-13 days and more than 14 days. Patients started PD within 2 weeks and after 2 weeks were defined as early-start and conventional-start, respectively. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome measures were peritonitis free survival and technical survival. Mechanical and infectious complications in the first 180 days were also analyzed.Results: Early-start PD patients were more likely to have higher serum total carbon dioxide and creatinine levels and lower serum albumin, Kt/v, creatinine clearance (Ccr) and residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR) levels at the start of PD. The median follow-up period was 30 months (interquartile range, 13-53 months). A worse survival was observed in the early-start group than that in the conventional-start group (p < 0.001), even adjustment for the covariates (HR 1.549, 95%CI 1.104-2.173, p = 0.011). In the subgroup analysis, in patients commencing PD after 2006 early-start and conventional-start PD patients had comparable survival. No differences were observed in the rate of infectious and mechanical complications, peritonitis-free survival and technique survival between early-start and conventional-start PD patients.Conclusions: Early-start PD could be a safe and effective strategy for patients needing unplanned dialysis initiation with the progress of technology on PD.

Keywords: Early-start dialysis; peritoneal dialysis; prognosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cause of Death
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peritoneal Dialysis / adverse effects
  • Peritoneal Dialysis / methods*
  • Peritoneal Dialysis / mortality*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

This study was partly supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [grant number 2018BFG02010 to CL]; National Natural Scientific Foundation, China [grant number 81470937 to CL], [grant number 81641024 to CL]; National Key Point Research Program Precision Medicine [grant number 2016YFC0901500 to CL]; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [grant number CIFMS 2016-12 M-2-004 to CL]; and the Xiehe scholar grant (to CL).