Clinical Evaluation Techniques for Injury Risk Assessment in Elite Swimmers: A Systematic Review

Sports Health. 2021 Jan/Feb;13(1):57-64. doi: 10.1177/1941738120920518. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

Abstract

Context: Evidence concerning a systematic, comprehensive injury risk assessment in the elite swimming population is scarce.

Objective: To evaluate the quality of current literature regarding clinical assessment techniques used to evaluate the presence and/or development of pain/injury in elite swimmers and to categorize objective clinical assessment tools into relevant predictors (constructs) that should consistently be evaluated in injury risk screens of elite swimmers.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and the Cochrane Library Reviews were searched through September 2018.

Study selection: Studies were included for review if they assessed a correlation between clinic-based objective measures and the presence and/or development of acute or chronic pain/injury in elite swimmers. All body regions were included. Elite swimmers were defined as National Collegiate Athletic Association, collegiate, and junior-, senior-, or national-level swimmers. Only cohort and cross-sectional studies were included (both prospective and retrospective); randomized controlled trials, expert opinion, and case reports were excluded, along with studies that focused on interventions, performance, or specific swim-stroke equipment or technology.

Study design: Systematic review and qualitative analysis.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Data extraction: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were utilized at each phase of review by 2 reviewers; a third reviewer was utilized for tie breaking purposes. Qualitative analysis was performed using the Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) assessment tool.

Results: A total of 21 studies assessed the presence and/or development of injury/pain in 3 different body regions: upper extremity, lower extremity, and spine. Calculated average MINORS scores for comparative (n = 17) and noncomparative (n = 4) studies were 18.1 of 24 and 10.5 of 16, respectively. Modifiable, objectively measurable injury risk factors in elite swimmers were categorized into 4 constructs: (1) strength/endurance, (2) mobility, (3) static/dynamic posture, and (4) patient-report regardless of body region.

Conclusion: Limited evidence exists to draw specific correlations between identified clinical objective measures and the development of pain and/or injury in elite swimmers.

Keywords: assessment; elite swimmers; injury risk.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Lower Extremity / injuries
  • Lower Extremity / physiopathology
  • Muscle Strength
  • Physical Examination
  • Posture
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Report
  • Spinal Injuries / etiology
  • Spinal Injuries / physiopathology
  • Swimming / injuries*
  • Upper Extremity / injuries
  • Upper Extremity / physiopathology