"I want to really crack this nut": an analysis of parent-perceived policy needs surrounding food allergy

BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):1194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09309-w.

Abstract

Background: In Canada, anaphylaxis-level food allergy constitutes a legal disability. Yet, no nationwide policies exist to support families. We sought to understand what parents of children with food allergy perceive as the most pressing food allergy-related policy concerns in Canada.

Methods: Between March-June 2019, we interviewed 23 families whose food allergic children (N = 28mean age 7.9 years) attending an allergy clinic in Winnipeg, Canada. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Over 40% of children had multiple food allergies, representing most of Health Canada's priority allergens. We identified four themes: (1) High prevalence. High priority?. (2) Food labels can be misleading, (3) Costs and creative ideas, and (4) Do we have to just deal with the status quo around allergies?

Conclusion: Food allergy ought to be a national policy priority, to improve the process for precautionary labelling, to improve funding, educational tools access to care, and knowledge of current allergy guidelines.

Keywords: Children; Food allergy; Patient-oriented research; Perceived needs; Policy; Qualitative.

MeSH terms

  • Allergens
  • Canada
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Food Hypersensitivity* / epidemiology
  • Food Labeling* / standards
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Nuts
  • Parents*
  • Prevalence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Allergens