The rise and fall of heterologous transfusion

J Anesth Hist. 2020 Sep;6(3):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.janh.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

Abstract

Now a routine lifesaving treatment, blood transfusion between humans became a safe procedure only after many early therapeutic disasters. Performed between different species, heterologous transfusions actually succeeded homologous transfusions, those performed between members of the same species. In the early history of transfusion, both homologous and heterologous transfusions were performed in many clinical settings. Early clinicians were unable to distinguish between deaths caused by baseline illness and those resulting from transfusions. This report examines both early experiments with homologous transfusion between animals and later efforts investigating and finally abandoning heterologous transfusion. Topics explored include: 1) contributions and lessons learned from key individuals, 2) how these researchers suggested, performed, advocated, or challenged the practice of heterologous transfusion, and 3) why heterologous transfusions were even considered as a mode of therapy.

Keywords: Blood; History of medicine; Transfusion.

Publication types

  • Historical Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Blood Grouping and Crossmatching / history
  • Blood Transfusion / history*
  • Blood Transfusion / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Blood Transfusion / methods
  • Exchange Transfusion, Whole Blood / history
  • History, 15th Century
  • History, 17th Century
  • History, 19th Century
  • History, Ancient
  • Humans
  • Transplantation, Heterologous / adverse effects
  • Transplantation, Heterologous / history*