Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102004. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102004. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility,tolerability, and safety of the ultrasound assessment of tubal patency using foam as contrast.

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study of 915 infertile nulliparous women scheduled for sonohysterosalpingography with foam instillation (HYFOSY) for tubal patency testing as a part of the fertility workup. Clinical and sonographic data were recorded into a web-shared database. Tubal patency, cervical catheterization, pain during the procedure and post-procedural complications were collected. Patients reported discomfort or pain experienced during the procedure with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score.

Results: Nine hundred fifteen women were included in the final analysis. Median age was 34 (range, 21-45) years and median body mass index was 23 (range, 16-41) kg/m2. Of 839 women, only 8(0.95 %) cases were abandoned due to impossibility of introducing the intracervical catheter. Most of the cervical os were easily cannulated with either paediatric nasogastric probes or special catheter for intrauterine insemination / sonohysterosalpingography 688/914(75.3 %). With a median instillation of 4 mL (range 1-16) of foam, both tubes were identified in 649/875 (70.9 %) patients, while unilateral patency was observed in 190/875 (20.8 %). Only 36/875 (3.9 %) of the women had bilateral tubal obstruction. The median VAS score for perception of pain during HyFoSy examination was 2 (range 0-10), and only 17 (1.9 %) of women reported severe pain (VAS ≥ 7). Pain was unrelated to tubal patency or tubal blockage. Unexpectedly, difficult cervical catheterizations that needed tenaculum, were more likely associated with mild pain during procedure [nasogastric probe group 176/289 (70.9 %) vs. insemination catheter group 166/399 (41.6 %) vs. tenaculum group 190/218(87.2 %) p < 0.001]. Finally, among 915 patients, we only noticed 3 (0.32 %) complications of the technique: two vasovagal episodes and a mild urinary infection.

Conclusion: HYFOSY is a feasible, well-tolerated and safe technique for the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women.

Keywords: Feasibility; Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography; Tolerability; Tubal patency.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Body Mass Index
  • Catheterization / adverse effects
  • Catheterization / instrumentation
  • Catheterization / methods
  • Cervix Uteri
  • Contrast Media
  • Fallopian Tube Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Fallopian Tube Patency Tests / methods*
  • Fallopian Tubes / diagnostic imaging*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Follicular Phase
  • Humans
  • Infertility, Female
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Procedural / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Spain
  • Ultrasonography / adverse effects
  • Ultrasonography / methods*
  • Uterus / diagnostic imaging*
  • Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies