Usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infection after internal fixation of closed hand fractures

Abstract

Prophylactic antibiotics (PA) have been shown to be ineffective in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in clean wounds associated with elective surgery of the hand. Routine administration of PA for internal fixation of hand fractures is a subject that has been scarcely studied. We hypothesized that PA do not reduce SSI incidence in fixation of closed hand fractures. We did a retrospective comparative study in patients who underwent open or closed reduction and internal fixation of a hand and carpus fracture. Patient demographics, past medical history, fracture characteristics and the type of internal fixation used were extracted from our electronic archives. Follow-up period lasted for 1 year, during which any form of clinically evident SSI, such as pus formation, wound dehiscence and positive bacterial culture was documented. A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria, 63 in the control group and 44 in the test group. The overall infection rate was 6.5%. All infections (3 in the control group and 4 in the test group) were pin-tract infections that resolved completely after pin extraction. Our study did not find significant differences between groups (P = 0.442). No specific fracture pattern was associated with increased total infection rate (p = 0.898). In this study, we found no support for routine administration of PA prior to internal fixation of closed fractures of the hand and carpus. PA should still be administered in selected patients, such as those with decreased immunity or open fractures. Further large-scale research is needed to establish proper guidelines, to reduce the adverse effects of antibiotic treatment.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Antibiotiques; Fracture; Hand; Main.