The use of mechanical circulatory devices to support high-risk elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become more common as the group of patients considered inoperable or high risk for surgical revascularization has grown. Most of the data examining outcomes in high-risk PCI are observational and retrospective. Limited prospective randomized studies have been unable to show improved clinical outcomes with routine mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with a high burden of coronary artery disease and reduced ejection fraction. The role for MCS in high-risk PCI continues to evolve as understanding of the appropriate groups for this therapy evolves.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Heart-assist devices; Hemodynamics; High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; Mechanical circulatory support; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Risk assessment.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.