Direct healthcare costs associated with management of asthma: comparison of two treatment regimens in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam

J Asthma. 2022 Jun;59(6):1213-1220. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1903915. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

Abstract

Objective: Daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA) combinations comprising either regular maintenance therapy with ICS/LABA plus as-needed short-acting beta-2-agonist (SABA) or ICS-formoterol combinations used as maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) are recommended for moderate asthma. This analysis compares the direct costs of twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/salm) and budesonide/formoterol MART in three Southeast Asian countries.

Methods: A literature review identified three randomized trials in patients with asthma (≥ 12 years) comparing regular twice-daily FP/salm with as-needed SABA versus MART in moderate asthma: AHEAD (NCT00242775/17 countries/2309 patients), COMPASS (AstraZeneca study SD-039-0735/16 countries/3335 patients), and COSMOS (AstraZeneca study SD-039-0691/16 countries/2143 patients). Economic analyses, conducted from a healthcare sector perspective (medication costs + healthcare utilization costs), applied unit costs from countries where healthcare costs are publicly available: Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. Results are expressed in British pound sterling (GBP/patient/year).

Results: Annual exacerbation rates were low and differences between treatment strategies were small (range, FP/salm: 0.31-0.38, MART: 0.24-0.25) although statistically significant in favor of MART. Total average (minimum-maximum) direct costs (in GBP/patient/year) across the three studies were £187 (£137-£284), £158 (£125-£190), and £151 (£141-£164) for those who used FP/salm, and £242 (£217-£267), £284 (£237-£340) and £266 (£224-£315) for MART in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam, respectively. On average, total direct costs/patient/year with FP/salm were 22.8%, 44.6% and 43.0% lower than with MART for Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam, respectively.

Conclusions: In the three countries evaluated, total treatment costs with regular twice-daily FP/salm were consistently lower than with budesonide/formoterol MART due to lower direct healthcare costs.

Keywords: ICS/LABA; Southeast Asia; healthcare utilization; maintenance therapy; medication.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones / therapeutic use*
  • Asthma* / drug therapy
  • Asthma* / economics
  • Budesonide / economics
  • Budesonide / therapeutic use
  • Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination / economics
  • Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination / therapeutic use*
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ethanolamines / therapeutic use
  • Formoterol Fumarate / therapeutic use
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Indonesia
  • Thailand
  • Vietnam

Substances

  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones
  • Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ethanolamines
  • Budesonide
  • Formoterol Fumarate