Aim: Pre-mortem interventions (PMIs) are performed on patients before the determination of death in order to preserve or enhance the possibility of organ donation. These interventions can be ethically controversial, and we thus undertook a scoping review of the ethical issues surrounding diverse PMIs.
Methods: Using modified scoping review methods, we executed a search strategy created by an information specialist. Screening and iterative coding of each article was done by two researchers using qualitative thematic analysis, and narrative summaries of coded themes were presented.
Results: We identified and screened 5365 references and coded 196 peer-reviewed publications. The most frequently cited issues were related to possible harms to the patient who is a potential donor, and legitimacy of consent. The most controversial issue was that PMIs may place patients at risk for physical harm, yet benefit is accrued mainly to recipients. Some authors argued that lack of direct medical benefit to the still living patient precluded valid consent from surrogate decision makers (SDMs), while many stated that some medical risk could be approved by SDMs if it aligns with non-medical benefits valued by the patient.
Conclusion: PMIs require consensus that benefit includes concepts beyond medical benefit to the patient who is a potential donor. Informed consent must be confirmed for each PMI and not assumed to be part of general consent for donation. Risk must be proportionate to the potential benefit and newly proposed interventions should be reviewed carefully for medical efficacy and potential risks.
Keywords: Antemortem interventions; Elective ventilation; End of life care; Ethics; Organ donation and transplantation; Premortem interventions.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.