Association of Self-Efficacy, Transition Readiness and Diabetes Distress With Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Preparing to Transition to Adult Care

Can J Diabetes. 2021 Jul;45(5):490-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 19.

Abstract

Objectives: Adolescence and emerging adulthood are associated with inadequate medical follow up, suboptimal glycemic control and higher risk for adverse outcomes. Our aim in this study was to determine whether self-efficacy, transition readiness or diabetes distress is associated with glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [A1C]) among adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) preparing to transition to adult care.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adolescents (age 17 years) with T1D followed at the Montreal Children's Hospital Diabetes Clinic 1 year before transferring to adult care. Participants completed validated questionnaires on self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Self-Management Measure [SEDM], score 1 to 10), transition readiness (Am I ON TRAC? For Adult Care questionnaire [TRAC], score ≥8 indicates readiness) and diabetes distress (Diabetes Distress Scale for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes [T1-DDS], score ≥3 indicates distress). The primary outcome was A1C (%) 1 year before transfer. We examined associations of self-efficacy, transition readiness and diabetes distress with A1C using multivariate linear and logistic regression models adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis and socioeconomic status.

Results: Of 74 adolescents with T1D (29 males, 39.1%), 27 (36.4%) had suboptimal glycemic control (A1C ≥9.0%). Less than half were transition-ready (TRAC questionnaire score ≥8) and 14% had diabetes distress (T1-DDS score ≥3). SEDM was not associated with A1C. Adolescents considered ready for transition were less likely to have suboptimal glycemic control (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.99), whereas adolescents with diabetes distress were more likely to have suboptimal glycemic control (odds ratio, 6.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 36.75).

Conclusions: Improving health-care transition within pediatric care should focus on both transition readiness and diabetes distress to help improve adolescents' glycemic control and prepare them for adult care.

Keywords: adolescents; auto-efficacité; diabetes distress; diabète de type 1; détresse liée au diabète; niveau de préparation à la transition; self-efficacy; transition readiness; type 1 diabetes.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / psychology*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / therapy
  • Female
  • Glycated Hemoglobin / analysis
  • Glycemic Control / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychological Distress*
  • Self Care / psychology
  • Self Efficacy*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Transition to Adult Care*

Substances

  • Glycated Hemoglobin A