Comparison of myocardial T1 mapping during breath-holding and free-breathing

Cardiol Young. 2022 Jun;32(6):925-929. doi: 10.1017/S1047951121003292. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

Abstract

Background: T1 mapping is a recently developed imaging analysis method that allows quantitative assessment of myocardial T1 values obtained using MRI. In children, MRI is performed under free-breathing. Thus, it is important to know the changes in T1 values between free-breathing and breath-holding. This study aimed to compare the myocardial T1 mapping during breath-holding and free-breathing.

Methods: Thirteen patients and eight healthy volunteers underwent cardiac MRI, and T1 values obtained during breath-holding and free-breathing were examined and compared. Statistical differences were determined using the paired t-test.

Results: The mean T1 values during breath-holding were 1211.1 ± 39.0 ms, 1209.7 ± 37.4 ms, and 1228.9 ± 52.5 ms in the basal, mid, and apical regions, respectively, while the mean T1 values during free-breathing were 1165.1 ± 69.0 ms, 1103.7 ± 55.8 ms, and 1112.0 ± 81.5 ms in the basal, mid, and apical regions, respectively. The T1 values were lower during free-breathing than during breath-holding in almost all segments (basal: p = 0.008, mid: p < 0.001, apical: p < 0.001). The mean T1 values in each cross section were 3.1, 7.8, and 7.7% lower during free-breathing than during breath-holding in the basal, mid, and apical regions, respectively.

Conclusions: We found that myocardial T1 values during free-breathing were about 3-8% lower in all cross sections than those during breath-holding. In free-breathing, it may be difficult to assess myocardial T1 values, except in the basal region, because of underestimation; thus, the findings should be interpreted with caution, especially in children.

Keywords: Cardiac MRI; T1 mapping; breath-holding; free-breathing; respiratory motion.

MeSH terms

  • Breath Holding*
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted* / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Myocardium
  • Reproducibility of Results