Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation: Results in 40 Consecutive Patients

Robert O'Connell; Marcus Hoof; John Heffernan; Michael O'Brien; Felix Savoie

doi:10.1177/23259671211014230

Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation: Results in 40 Consecutive Patients

Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 27;9(7):23259671211014230. doi: 10.1177/23259671211014230. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Authors

Robert O'Connell¹, Marcus Hoof², John Heffernan³, Michael O'Brien⁴, Felix Savoie⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
² School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
³ Proliance Puget Sound Orthopaedics, Lakewood, Washington, USA.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Abstract

Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair has been proven to be effective in nonprofessional overhead-throwing athletes, with faster and higher rates of return to play (RTP) than the more traditional Tommy John reconstruction. Biomechanical studies and clinical data suggest that MUCL repair augmented with a collagen-coated internal brace may be an effective treatment option in this patient population.

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcomes of young nonprofessional athletes who underwent MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation for medial elbow instability. The hypothesis was that these patients will have high rates of RTP and improved functional outcomes.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Nonprofessional overhead athletes treated with MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation between 2015 and 2017 were prospectively evaluated for a minimum of 1 year. Preoperatively, all patients had evidence of medial elbow pain caused by MUCL insufficiency, as confirmed by signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging and valgus instability on arthroscopic examination. These findings did not allow them to participate in their chosen sport or profession, and each patient had failed nonoperative treatment. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the Overhead Athlete Shoulder and Elbow Score of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic. Complications were recorded and detailed.

Results: A total of 40 nonprofessional overhead athletes were included in this study (35 men and 5 women; mean age, 17.8 years [range, 14-28 years]). The mean follow-up time was 23.8 months (range, 12-44 months). The mean postoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score was 92.6 (range, 64-100). Overall, 37 athletes (92.5%) returned to play or profession at the same level or higher at a mean time of 6.9 months (range, 2-12 months). Three patients did not RTP: 1 was limited by a concomitant medical diagnosis, and the other 2 chose not to resume athletics after the procedure but remained symptom free.

Conclusion: In the nonprofessional athlete, primary MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a viable alternative to traditional repair techniques or reconstruction, allowing for a rapid RTP and promising functional outcomes.

Keywords: MUCL; MUCL repair; internal brace; medial elbow instability.