Reply to: When adopting Global Lung Function Initiative reference values, can we also adapt them to a local context as needed?
Eur Respir J
.
2021 Sep 16;58(3):2102020.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02020-2021.
Print 2021 Sep.
Authors
Sanja Stanojevic
1
,
Brendan Cooper
2
,
Nicole Filipow
3
,
Jane Kirkby
4
,
Gregg Ruppel
5
,
Irene Steenbruggen
6
,
Bruce Thompson
7
,
Graham Hall
8
9
Affiliations
1
Dept of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada sanja.stanojevic@dal.ca.
2
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Lung Investigation Unit, Birmingham, UK.
3
Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
4
Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Respiratory Laboratory, Sheffield, UK.
5
Dept of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
6
Lung Function Laboratory, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
7
School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
8
Children's Lung Health, Wal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
9
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
PMID:
34531256
DOI:
10.1183/13993003.02020-2021
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological*
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Lung*
Reference Values
Spirometry