Objective: To use a systems paradigm to examine upper limb (UL) motor intervention elements driving biomarker and clinical measure improvement after stroke.
Methods: Databases were searched up to March 2022. Eligibility screening was completed by 2 authors. Studies using biomarkers and clinical measures pre- and post-upper limb intervention were included. Studies of adjunct interventions (eg, brain stimulation) were excluded. Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tools and Template for Intervention Description and Replication were used to rate studies. Studies were synthesized using a systems paradigm: intervention outcome was considered an emergent property of the systemic interactions of 4 intervention elements (demographics, type, quality, and dose) characterized by individual dimensions.
Results: Sixty-four studies (n = 1814 participants) containing 106 intervention groups (66 experimental; 40 control) were included. Combined biomarker and clinical outcomes defined 3 scenarios: restitution, mixed, and unchanged. The restitution scenario included more moderate-to-severely impaired participants in earlier recovery phases (<6 months). Interventions with graded difficulty were more frequently used in the restitution scenario compared with the unchanged scenario. No difference in quality or amount of therapy was identified when examining scenarios that demonstrated restitution compared to those that did not (mixed and unchanged).
Conclusions: A systems paradigm may be one of many approaches to understand UL motor restitution. This review found no single element consistently delivered improvements in biomarkers and clinical measures in the examined intervention groups. Complex patterns formed by multiple interacting intervention elements were observed in participants with and without restitution.
Keywords: motor recovery; neuroimaging; outcomes; stroke rehabilitation; upper extremity.