Psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278235. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress is often linked to and negatively affects the outcomes of chronic medical conditions; however, data on psychological distress and its predictors among individuals with chronic medical illnesses are scarce in developing countries like Ethiopia. The main objective of this study was to assess the magnitude and predictors of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population.

Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Mecha demographic research center, Northwest Ethiopia. The participants were selected from the general population and outpatient departments. Kessler-10 (K-10) was used to assess psychological distress.

Result: The magnitude of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and those from the general population was 62.0% and 35.1%, respectively. The odds of psychological distress in people living with chronic medical illness was three times more than the one in the general population. Divorced marital status, family history of chronic medical illness, and low social support were statistically significantly associated with psychological distress in both groups.

Conclusion: The magnitude of psychological distress was significantly higher among people living with chronic medical illness. Routine screening of such cases for psychological distress during their visits for their medical illness helps take appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chronic Disease
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Ethiopia / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Psychological Distress*
  • Social Support

Grants and funding

This research work was financially supported by Bahir Dar University and the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.