MDS-UDPRS-III in the diagnosis of idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting surgery. Results from a retrospective large cohort of patients

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the entity of extrapyramidal signs, characterize them and evaluate the dynamics of change by the mean of MDS-UPDRS-III in iNPH patients after the TT to determine if this tool may help the diagnosis of iNPH and the identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from 120 patients with the initial diagnosis of possible iNPH; they underwent neurological examination by the means of MDS-UPDRS-III and other scales before and after Tap Test (TT). They were then classified as defined iNPH (57), probable iNPH (35), and NOT-iNPH (28) based on the clinical response after the Tap Test and VPS.

Results: After the Tap Test, defined and probable iNPH groups improved by 3.35 (2.57-4.12, p < 0.001) and 3.43 (2.43-4.4, p < 0.001) points on MDS-UPDRS-III respectively; NOT-iNPH did not improve significantly on MDS-UPDRS-III and on any other variable studies. Defined iNPH also shifted significantly from asymmetric prevalence of symptoms to a more symmetric form (from 70% before to 57% after).

Conclusion: extrapyramidal signs improved significantly after the Tap Test in definite and probable iNPH patients. MDS-UPDRS-III may be a useful complementary tool in the diagnosis of iNPH and identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting.

Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt; Extrapyramidal signs; Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus; Parkinsonism; Shunt outcome; TUG; UPDRS.