COMPARISON OF THE 64- AND 80-DETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AMONG THE CT NUMBER AND RADIATION DOSE DURING LOWER EXTREMITY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Mar 17;199(4):356-362. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncac277.

Abstract

To compare the computed tomography (CT) number and the radiation dose between the 64 (group A) and 80-detector row (group B) during lower extremity computed tomography angiography (LE-CTA). We enrolled 144 patients underwent LE-CTA and compared the CT number for the popliteal arteries, radiation dose and the rate of the optimal CT number during the LE-CTA exceeding 200 HU between the two groups. The CT number for the popliteal arteries and mean dose-length product was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (P < 0.01). The rate of the optimal CT number for the popliteal arteries was 23.6% with Group B scanner and 56.9% with Group A (P < 0.05). The 64-detector row CT was significantly higher in the CT number for the popliteal arteries, radiation dose and rate of the optimal CT number during the LE-CTA than the 80-detector row. Depiction ability did not improve by using a high CT scanner with a wider detector during LE-CTA.

MeSH terms

  • Angiography* / methods
  • Computed Tomography Angiography*
  • Humans
  • Lower Extremity / blood supply
  • Lower Extremity / diagnostic imaging
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed