Otolaryngology resident familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup: A pilot study

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to determine otolaryngology (ORL) residents' ability to prepare the operating room independently for ORL surgical cases and their familiarity with ORL surgical instruments and related equipment.

Methods: A 24-question, one-time, anonymous survey was distributed to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery program directors for distribution among their residents in the United States in November 2022. Residents in every post-graduate year were surveyed. Spearman's ranked correlation and Mann-Whitney U test were used.

Results: The response rate among program directors was 9.5 % (11/116 programs), while the response rate among residents was 51.5 % (88/171 residents). A total of 88 survey responses were completed. 61 % of ORL residents who responded were able to name most instruments used in surgical cases. The most recognized surgical instruments by ORL residents were microdebrider (99 %) and alligator forceps (98 %); the least recognized were bellucci micro scissors (72 %) and pituitary forceps (52 %); and all instruments except the microdebrider showed significantly increased recognition with increasing post graduate training year (PGY), p ≤ 0.05. ORL residents were most able to set up independently the electrocautery (77 %) and laryngoscope suspension (73 %), while they were least able to set up the robot laser (6.8 %) and coblator (26 %) independently. All instruments showed significant positive correlations with increasing PGY; the strongest correlation was found in laryngoscope suspension, r = 0.74. 48 % of ORL residents reported that there were times when surgical techs and nurses were not available. Only 54 % of ORL residents reported being able to set up instruments when alone in the operating room, including 77.8 % of PGY-5 residents. Only 8 % of residents reported receiving education related to surgical instruments from their residency program, while 85 % thought that ORL residencies should have courses or educational materials about surgical instruments.

Conclusion: ORL residents' familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup improved throughout their training. However, specific instruments had much lower recognition than others and a lower ability for independent setup. Nearly half of ORL residents reported being unable to set up surgical instruments in the absence of surgical staff. Implementation of surgical instrument education may improve these deficiencies.

Keywords: Otolaryngology; Resident; Surgical instrument; Surgical training.