Decisional conflict in American parents regarding newborn circumcision

Abstract

Background: Decisional conflict surrounding the topic of circumcision in the newborn male is assumed in some parents but has not been quantified or qualified. It is known that parents often base their decision on cultural and social factors and that physician discussions do affect ultimate decision-making. Information on parents' decision-making surrounding newborn circumcision and ways to mitigate conflict or uncertainty around the decision-making process is needed to better counsel them appropriately.

Objectives: To identify the presence or absence of decisional conflict in parents-to-be deciding whether or not to circumcise their child as well as to identify determinants of this conflict to direct future educational measures.

Study design: Parents presenting to obstetrics clinic as well as contacted by institutional email were recruited using convenience sampling and completed the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). A smaller subset of subjects were recruited via institutional email to complete semi-structured interviews regarding the decision-making process and specifically uncertainty regarding the decision. Descriptive statistics and unpaired t tests were used for analysis of survey data. For interview data, an iterative, grounded theory methodology was used.

Results: 173 subjects completed the DCS. 12% of all participants had high decisional conflict. Intuitively, those who had not yet decided whether to circumcise had the highest proportion of high DCS (69%), followed by those who had decided to circumcise (9.3%) and those who had decided not to circumcise (1.7%). 24 subjects were interviewed, and based on their DCS scores and interview responses were classified as low, intermediate and high conflict. Three primary themes emerged delineating the high from low conflict groups. There were notable differences in the feelings of subjects regarding knowledge and feeling informed, the importance of particular values and clarity of the roles of these values in decision-making, and feelings of supported decision-making. These themes were used to create a visual model depicting the individual needs of each decision-maker (Fig. 1).

Discussion: This study highlights the need for decision support for parents that is not only information-based but focuses on values clarity and supported decision-making. This study provides a jumping-off point for creation of shared decision-making tools directed at individual needs. The limitations of this study are a single institution design and homogeneous population, so when designing materials, additional unrecognized needs will likely be identified.

Conclusion: A small, but real proportion of parents-to-be experience significant uncertainty around the decision to circumcise their newborn boys. Identified needs of parents include feeling informed, feeling supported and clarification of important values related to the problem.

Keywords: Circumcision; Decisional conflict; Shared decision-making.