The ideal and the real: Patient and bereaved family caregiver perspectives on the significance of place of death

Death Stud. 2024;48(4):312-325. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2225042. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

Abstract

Home has become established as the preferred place of death within health policy and practice in the UK and internationally. However, growing awareness of the structured inequalities underpinning end-of-life care and the challenges for family members undertaking care at home raise questions about the nature of patient and public preferences and priorities regarding place of death and the feasibility of home management of the complex care needs at the end-of-life. This paper presents findings from a qualitative study of 12 patients' and 34 bereaved family caregivers' perspectives and priorities regarding place of death. Participants expressed complex and nuanced accounts in which place of death was not afforded an overarching priority. The study findings point to public pragmatism and flexibility in relation to place of death, and the misalignment of current policy with public priorities that are predominantly for comfort and companionship at the end-of-life, regardless of place.

MeSH terms

  • Caregivers
  • Death
  • Family
  • Hospice Care*
  • Humans
  • Palliative Care
  • Terminal Care*

Grants and funding

The study was funded by Marie Curie, UK.